Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 046
Original file (2013 046.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-046

 

 

 

TIS 3 yrs, 2 months, 2 days
Policy Implications _| None

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with drugs. The applicant’s complete
Personnel Data Record and Separation Package were available for the Board to review.

The applicant admitted to investigators in the Fall of October 2011 to using spice. The applicant’s command
determined this to be a drug incident. Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge. Per
ALCOAST 605/10, the use of spice was specified as illegal for all Coast Guard members.

The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

The applicant was notified of the intent to discharge, and the applicant was also advised of the rights to an
attorney. The applicant declined to make a statement and did not object to discharge.

Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for
individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The USCG has zero tolerance for
drug abuse. The Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.

Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 075

    Original file (2012 075.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Prior to the applicant’s drug use in 2011, ALCOAST 605/10 was in place to specifically list Spice as an illegal drug, and usage of said substance would result in a Discharge from the service. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 027

    Original file (2014 027.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to policy, the applicant he was recommended for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 012

    Original file (2013 012.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge separation due to a drug incident. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 004

    Original file (2014 004.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with drugs in 2011. The applicant admitted to the Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS) in the Fall of 2010 to using marijuana on different occasions. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 047

    Original file (2014 047.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Board endorses an administrative change to amend the Character of Service to Under Honorable Conditions based on the issuance of ALCOAST 562/08. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General Discharge, with an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 010

    Original file (2014 010.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 011

    Original file (2014 011.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 001

    Original file (2014 001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. Therefore, the Board recommends the use of SPD code JKM to accurately categorize this as an act of misconduct not otherwise listed by the JKK SPD code. Additionally, the Board notes that the DD-214 issued ‘General’ for the Character of Service.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 071

    Original file (2013 071.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. Pursuant to policy, he was recommended for Discharge due to the drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 016

    Original file (2013 016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable. The appropriate character of service is “Under Honorable Conditions,” therefore the Board recommends an administrative change to the applicant’s record to reflect “Under Honorable Conditions.” Propriety: Discharge was proper.